As India faces heated protests and a Supreme Court order to relocate Delhi-NCR’s stray dogs, the world offers contrasting examples—from the Netherlands’ zero-stray success to Turkey’s shelter-and-release model. Can India balance public safety with compassion?

What’s Happening Now?

1. Supreme Court’s Directive

On August 11, 2025, the Supreme Court issued a significant order: all stray dogs in Delhi-NCR must be captured, sterilized, vaccinated, and moved into shelters within eight weeks. No dog may be released back onto the streets. Authorities must also install CCTV surveillance and a helpline to monitor compliance.

The bench sharply criticized civic bodies for neglecting the rising threat of dog bites and rabies.

2. Building Shelters

Greater Noida authorities have responded with plans to establish three new shelters, each spanning 2,000–4,000 sq m, to be operated by NGOs under long-term contracts. These facilities will provide food, medical care, and adoption programs.

3. Wide-Ranging Responses

Animal rights advocates—including PETA India, the AWBI, and experts—decry the ruling as unscientific, impractical, and a fundamental breach of the existing Animal Birth Control (ABC) Rules, 2023 which stipulate sterilization, vaccination, and returning dogs to their local territories.

Former minister Maneka Gandhi questioned the feasibility, citing mandatory shelter infrastructure and staffing costs potentially running into ₹15,000 crores.

PETA India labeled the court’s order “inhumane, cruel,” predicting chaos, overcrowding, and logistical collapse.

Editorial voices accuse the decision of ignoring law and science, citing outdated data and sidelining effective ABC strategies.

PETA and Humane World for Animals called the move “unscientific” and “ineffective,” urging instead that vaccination, sterilization campaigns, community involvement, and awareness be scaled.

4. Public and Celebrity Reaction

Deployed at India Gate, protesters—including feeders, rescuers, and caregivers—were detained while objecting to the mass removal. They highlighted the importance of ABC rules and community-led coexistence.

At Connaught Place, demonstrators chanted slogans like “They are like small kids,” spoke about dogs as beloved community members, and argued that disrupting their lives is cruel and disruptive.

Social media voices are deeply divided. Some emphasize public safety and support the court’s actions. Others reply emotionally:

“There’s just no compassion left… they will die of hunger and thirst there… that’s the death warrant the SC has signed.”
“Vaccination & sterilisation are… cheaper than building new shelters #savedelhidogs”

 

Celebrities reactions 

• Janhvi Kapoor and Varun Dhawan, condemned the judgment as “inhumane” and likened it to erasing a living heartbeat—urging humane alternatives like mass sterilization, adoption drives, and community care.
• Kapil Dev, former cricket captain, appealed for compassion, saying, *“Give them a better life, don’t throw them out.”*
• Actress Adah Sharma also echoed empathy, reminding that “It’s their country as much as it is ours,” and advocating adoption over purchase.
• RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat invoked cultural values, urging humane, scientific solutions instead of mass confinement, while Nepali voices cited Kukur Tihar traditions—calling for unity and compassion.

5. Why It Matters

An estimated 1 million stray dogs roam Delhi, part of India’s staggering 52.5 million nationwide. The issue is deeply emotional: compassionate caregivers see them as community guardians; others fear rising dog-bite and rabies cases.

Choosing mass relocation over continued ABC programs reflects a clash between immediate safety concerns and long-term humane coexistence strategies—highlighting gaps in infrastructure, law, governance, and empathy.

 

a complex issue tangled in legal, moral, scientific, and logistical threads. At stake are:

• Human safety—particularly for children and the elderly.
• Animal welfare—recognizing the emotional bonds communities share with strays.
• Feasibility—can our cities build humane, functional shelter systems fast enough?

Policy alignment—should court orders override or update long-standing ABC programs?

how other countries have approached the stray dog problem — and what lessons India could take from them:

1. Italy – “Community Dogs” Model

Approach: Italy’s law makes it illegal to kill healthy stray dogs. Instead, municipalities fund shelters, sterilization, and vaccination.

Dogs are often left in their original neighborhoods after treatment and tagged for identification.

Outcome: Stray numbers have dropped in cities like Rome, and community feeding is legal and common.

Lesson for India: Strengthen sterilization & community responsibility rather than mass removal.

 

2. Netherlands – “Zero Stray Dogs” Policy

Approach: The Netherlands is famous for eliminating street dogs without killing.

• Free nationwide sterilization.
• Mandatory dog registration & microchipping.
• Hefty fines for abandonment.
• Mass adoption campaigns.

Outcome: No stray dogs on streets, almost all are adopted pets.

Lesson: Strong laws + free vet services + public education = long-term success.

3. Turkey – Shelter & Release

Approach: Turkish law protects stray dogs; killing is banned.

• Dogs are caught, vaccinated, sterilized, and returned to their original location.
• Municipalities run large, well-maintained shelters for sick, injured, or aggressive dogs.

Outcome: Coexistence culture; dogs are fed by locals and even cared for by shop owners.

Lesson: Respect existing ABC (Animal Birth Control) rules but scale infrastructure.

4. Romania – From Kill Policy to Humane Control

History: Romania once practiced mass culling, sparking international outrage.

Now: Focus on sterilization, public education, and partnerships with NGOs for adoption abroad.

Outcome: Bite cases reduced without mass killing.

Lesson: Culling creates backlash; global partnerships can ease adoption pressure.

5. Thailand – Buddhist-Inspired Coexistence

Approach: High religious value placed on animal life.

• Monks and communities feed and care for stray dogs.
• NGOs provide mobile sterilization units.

Outcome: Stray dogs are visible but generally healthy and vaccinated.

Lesson: Community culture can be a powerful part of the solution.

6. United States – Shelter & Adoption System

Approach: Most cities have government-funded shelters + strong adoption networks.

• Stray dogs are impounded, vaccinated, sterilized, and put up for adoption.
• “No-Kill” shelters gaining popularity, though euthanasia still exists for aggressive/unadoptable cases.

Outcome: Many areas see low stray populations.

Lesson: Public-private partnerships and adoption drives can reduce shelter overcrowding.

7. Japan – Strict Licensing & Control

Approach: Dog ownership is tightly regulated.

• Mandatory licensing and microchipping.
• Stray dogs are rare; those found are sent to municipal shelters with a short adoption window.

Outcome: Very few strays; most dogs are pets with responsible owners.

Lesson: Prevention (responsible ownership) is easier than post-problem management.

 

 

 

India’s stray dog dilemma is not just a policy question—it’s a test of our compassion, governance, and foresight. The world has shown that safety and humanity can coexist, but it demands consistent sterilization, responsible ownership, and community involvement. We can either build a future of fear and cages or one of coexistence and care—the choice is ours.

Click here to know more:https://youtu.be/fCKzzjqh3rc?si=Hg7ymQJaB228vP7D